People are searching the internet for
information on how to care for their pets. Some veterinarians hate
this. Not me. It would be pretty hypocritical for me to rant about
"Dr. Internet" when I sort of am
The thing is, I try to confine my advice to
subjects that I personally know well. If I don't feel qualified to
answer, I look for a trusted resource, such as the specialists at a teaching
hospital, referral hospital, or Veterinary Information Network. The
searchable database on my own website is provided by Veterinary Partner.
It doesn't bother me when a client brings in
a pile of printouts like this. What does drive me crazy is the tendency to
accept baloney as holy writ, just because it's on the internet. I've
written about this before, but this new
episode just underscores its importance.
These clients have raised Collies for many
years, and are pretty knowledgeable, and VERY conscientious. They know
that many Collies carry the MDR1
mutation that makes them exceptionally sensitive to some drugs. The high
doses of ivermectin used to treat demodectic mange could kill a dog carrying
the MDR1 mutation.
The tiny dose of ivermectin in Heartgard is
considered safe for Collies by the internists and clinical
pharmacologists. Despite this, many Collie fanciers prefer to use
heartworm preventives without ivermectin, or even the other avermectins. That's
okay, but the alternative medication they had preferred (Interceptor) has been
unavailable for several months. These nice folks are terribly conflicted
I have tried to reassure them about the
safety of other products in their dogs, but they are unconvinced. They
have told me about the information they have received from their breed
associations advising them against it. I am open-minded about this, and am more
than willing to look at this information. More than once I have asked them
to bring it in so that I can learn what the objections are.
I want to know what the objections are, and I want to know the
qualifications of the person who is presenting the data.
They had trouble finding the Collie
association publication, so they brought me some things that they had googled
up. No problem… Okay, actually there are two problems.
The first problem is that the articles only
address the general concerns about dogs with the MDR1 mutation and their
ability to handle certain drugs (and do not mention the FACT that this is in
part dose dependent).
The second problem is the source of the
information. The articles are well-written, easy to understand.
They should be. The "authors" are writers by profession, not
scientists of any kind. They write on a wide variety of subjects for
eHow. I'm sure they are nice people, but they are just googling up
stuff and re-writing it. Just click on the link with their names and you
been writing and editing health, science and technology
related material for nine years. A lot of her experience was established in
producing articles and business documents for organizations that are not
proficient in English. She holds a Bachelor of Arts in psychology with a
"__________ has been writing since 2009 for various websites,
gardening, travel and green lifestyles. She graduated summa cum laude from
Northeastern Illinois University in 2001 with a major in English and a minor
Do these people sound like they are doing
research in clinical pharmacology or genetics? Do they even own a
dog? My clients are more
knowledgeable than the "experts" they found on the internet.
So feel free to surf the net all you want
to. BUT, when you are looking for something that is important to you,
also investigate the source.